Cases 51 - 60 of 85
Parrish v. USA
as 1:2016cv01433
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Melvin Lane Parrish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Witt v. Snider et al
as 1:2016cv01303
Plaintiff:
Matthew C Witt
Defendant:
Charles D Snider, Jr, Noel West Lane, III, Damon M Semmens and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Buske v. Sperluck et al
as 1:2016cv00585
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Buske
Defendant:
Tony Sperluck, Katz Martin and C. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
French et al v. City of Cortez et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Plaintiff:
Patti French , Glenn French and Shane French
Defendant:
City of Cortez , Casey Eubanks , Jennifer Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. 425 Thunderbird Drive, Cotopaxi, Colorado et al
as 1:2016cv00220
Defendant:
425 Thunderbird Drive, Cotopaxi, Colorado, $2,019.00 in United States Currency, $947.00 in United States Currency and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
Juan Luis Perez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Betts v. Archuleta et al
as 2:2004cv02542
Petitioner:
Donald Lane Betts
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Caito Foods Service, Inc. v. Lanes Consulting Firm, The LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01605
Plaintiff:
Caito Foods Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Lanes Consulting Firm, The, LLC and Jacob Howes
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0499
Lane-Woodstock v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lane-Woodstock
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Brandon Shaffer, Linda Lucero-Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodstock v. Larimer County Sheriff et al
as 1:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jonathan (Lane) Woodstock
Defendant:
Larimer County Sheriff, S. Shaffer, Bret Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kolecke et al v. West Custer County Hospital District
as 1:2014cv01992
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Kolecke , Joshua Johnson , Donna Milberger and others
Defendant:
West Custer County Hospital District
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
