Cases 71 - 80 of 275
Lane v. New Gencoat Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01386
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lane
Defendant:
New Gencoat Inc , KPS Special Situation Funds LP, Gencoat Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garrett v. Stirling et al
as 0:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Bernard McKie, Franklin Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane et al v. Dorn Veterans Hospital et al
as 3:2018cv00807
Plaintiff:
Patsy Maria Lane
Defendant:
Dorn Veterans Hospital, VA Fiduciary Hub, Chiquetta Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Benny et al
as 3:2018cv00808
Plaintiff:
Patsy Maria Lane
Defendant:
Susie Benny and S.C. Vocational Rehabitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2018cv00727
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lane Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mullinax v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00690
Plaintiff:
Tammie Lane Mullinax
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Community Bank of Pickens County v. Mabus et al
as 3:2018cv00296
Plaintiff:
Community Bank of Pickens County
Defendant:
Tommy Mabus , Patricia Mabus , Little Water Properties Inc LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cooper v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 3:2017cv03205
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Cooper
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, North Carolina, The State of, Lyman Patents and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Johnson v. Stirling et al
as 9:2017cv02209
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Jonathan Lane, Laura Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Lane
as 2:2017cv02128
Petitioner:
Alwin T Jones
Respondent:
Gary Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
