Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Southwest Foodservice Excellence LLC v. Lankford et al
as 2:2023cv02504
Plaintiff:
Southwest Foodservice Excellence LLC
Defendant:
Joshua Lankford, Daniel Saghir and Rodel Endaluz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Lankford v. Bradley et al
as 2:2022cv00623
Plaintiff:
Kirk Lankford
Defendant:
Jody Bradley, Todd Thomas, M Frink and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lankford et al v. Wagner et al
as 2:2021cv01562
Plaintiff:
David L Lankford and Lee Ann Lankford
Defendant:
Judith Wagner, Robert H Jacobvitz, Edward Mazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. Taylor et al
as 2:2017cv02797
Plaintiff:
Kirk Lankford
Defendant:
Joseph Taylor, Benjamin Griego, Jodi Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crossroads Program Group LLC v. McDowell Enterprises IV LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02271
Plaintiff:
Crossroads Program Group LLC
Defendant:
McDowell Enterprises IV LLC, J.R. McDowell Real Estate Incorporated, Lankford & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fields et al v. Tobin et al
as 2:2011cv01794
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Fields and Jefferson Lankford
Defendant:
Brian Tobin, Gregory Ferguson, Jeff McHenry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. Ryan et al
as 3:2010cv08040
Petitioner:
Donna Rae Lankford
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torrefranca v. McGregor et al
as 2:2009cv01518
Plaintiff:
Delmo Figura Torrefranca
Defendant:
Ruth V McGregor, Unknown Jones, Michael D Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lankford v. Ryan et al
as 3:2009cv08121
Petitioner:
Donna Rae Lankford
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
