Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Hicks v. Udashen
as 6:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Larry Hicks
Defendant:
Attorney Gary A Udashen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Virden, et al
as 23-3099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY CARLYLE THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
T-MOBILE U.S.A., DAVID L. PLATT, District Court Judge, Geary County District Court, in his individual capacity, GLEN F. VIRDEN, Senior Special Agent, Kansas Bureau of Investigation, in his individual capacity and others
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01920
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 7:2019cv00128
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Petitioner:
Larry Hicks, Larry Coleman Hicks and Dude Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 6:2019cv00537
Plaintiff:
Larry . Hicks
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Virden, et al
as 19-3072
Defendant / Appellee:
GEARY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, T-MOBILE U.S.A., KANSAS BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY CARLYLE THOMPSON
Larry Hicks v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company
as 19-5223
Defendant / Appellee:
DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee for RALI 2003-QS4
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY HICKS
Beasley v. Hicks et al
as 3:2018cv01193
Plaintiff:
Theodore Beasley
Defendant:
Larry Hicks, Kennedy Hamilton, C/O Ridder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pidgeon et al v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2018cv00675
Defendant:
City Of Houston and Sylvester Turner
Plaintiff:
Jack Pidgeon and Larry Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Renard Polk v. Robert Jones, et al
as 18-15259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENARD TRUMAN POLK
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT JONES, LARRY HICKS and MIRANDA M. DU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
