Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Jordan v. Hung et al
as 1:2015cv00900
Plaintiff:
Larry Jordan
Defendant:
H. Hung, J. Neubarth, R. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifford Herrington v. Larry Jordan, et al
as 14-13982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD MAURICE HERRINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY JORDAN, Deputy Warden of Security, Baldwin State Prison and JAMARIO ROSS, Correctional Officer, Baldwin State Prison
HARRIS v. TAYLOR et al
as 5:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
CHATTWYNE SINCLAIR HARRIS
Defendant:
CEDRIC TAYLOR, LARRY JORDAN and TRACY JEFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRINGTON v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2014cv00199
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD MAURICE HERRINGTON
Defendant:
LARRY JORDAN and JAMARIO ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Jordan v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv04000
Petitioner:
Larry Jordan
Respondent:
United States of America
Emeka Abanifi, Jr. v. Warden, et al
as 14-12207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMEKA MICHAEL ABANIFI, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, LARRY JORDAN, DOUG UNDERWOOD and others
Marquise Robbins v. Larry Jordan, et al
as 14-12137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARQUISE ROBBINS
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY JORDAN, Deputy Warden of Security, Baldwin State Prison, JEFFERSON, Deputy Warden of Security, Baldwin State Prison, RODNEY SMITH, Unit Manager, Baldwin State Prison and others
ROBBINS v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
MARQUISE ROBBINS
Defendant:
LARRY JORDAN, JEFFERSON, RODNEY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRINGTON v. ROSS et al
as 5:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD MAURICE HERRINGTON
Defendant:
ROSS and LARRY JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Larry Jordan
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
