Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jordan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03268
Plaintiff:
Larry Jordan
Defendant:
Inc. Ethicon and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2017md02782
Plaintiff:
Robert Gentry, Elizabeth Brady, Michelle Ayala and others
Defendant:
Does 1 - 50, Ethicon, Inc., Covidien, LP and others
Not Classified By Court:
Exponent Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARRIS v. TAYLOR et al
as 5:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
CHATTWYNE SINCLAIR HARRIS
Defendant:
CEDRIC TAYLOR, LARRY JORDAN and TRACY JEFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRINGTON v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2014cv00199
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD MAURICE HERRINGTON
Defendant:
LARRY JORDAN and JAMARIO ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBBINS v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
MARQUISE ROBBINS
Defendant:
LARRY JORDAN, JEFFERSON, RODNEY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRINGTON v. ROSS et al
as 5:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD MAURICE HERRINGTON
Defendant:
ROSS and LARRY JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABANIFI v. OUBRE et al
as 5:2012cv00421
Plaintiff:
EMEKA MICHAEL ABANIFI, JR
Defendant:
SHEILA OUBRE, LARRY JORDAN, DOUG UNDERWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
Carl Humphrey, Doug Underwood, Danny Piland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Owens et al
as 4:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Derrick Schofield, Harris Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Jordan v. A & K Energy Conservation, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01424
Plaintiff:
Larry Jordan
Defendant:
A & K Energy Conservation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
