Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Steven Riddick v. K. Moore
as 23-6395
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN RIDDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
K. MOORE, Correctional Officer, LARRY MULLINS, Hearings Officer, JEFFERY B. KISER, Warden and others
Riddick v. Kegley et al
as 7:2020cv00562
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick and Steven Riddick
Defendant:
Larry Mullins, Warden Jeffery Kiser, Raeann Kegley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorenzo Ferebee v. Karen Stapleton
as 20-7206
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN STAPLETON, Virginia Department of Corrections Offender Disciplinary Manager, LARRY MULLINS, Institutional Hearing Officer Red Onion State Prison, E. A. MILLER, Lieutenant Red Onion State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORENZA GERALD FEREBEE, JR.
Chand v. Kiser et al
as 7:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Ms. Murphy, C.O. Sexton, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
Vinnie Vincent Chand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00872
Defendant:
Joe Fannon, S.L. Escoffery, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Deondray Daniel Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emmitt Roscoe v. Larry Mullins
as 19-7343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMITT G. ROSCOE
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY MULLINS, Correctional Personal at Red Onion State Prison
Cooper v. Collins et al
as 7:2018cv00536
Defendant:
C/O Barry Mullins, C/O D. Webb, C/O Maloney and others
Plaintiff:
Israel Ray Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Jackson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2018cv00514
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Tori Raiford, C/O Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keystone v. McDuffy et al
as 7:2018cv00334
Defendant:
Larry Mullins, Mr. Herrick, Dr. E. McDuffy and others
Plaintiff:
Randall J. Keystone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
