Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02198
Plaintiff:
Anthony Schrader, Charles Ballard, Jessica Lawson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
USA v. Larry Young, Jr.
as 20-40506
Defendant / Appellant:
Larry Young, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv82982
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Boyd Bros. Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01272
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Miller and Joe Nathan Miller, II
Defendant:
Boyd Bros. Transportation, Inc., Larry Young and Boyd Bros. Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv46926
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv04012
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
LARRY YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIGHSMITH et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01186
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BROWN, JONATHAN HESS, JAMES WINGFIELD and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Highsmith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00975
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brown, Jonathan Hess, James Wingfield and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Young v. Hansen
as 8:2018cv00372
Respondent:
Brad Hansen
Petitioner:
Larry Young
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aly et al v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04230
Plaintiff:
Said Aly, Richard Dicrescento and Julio Ulloa
Defendant:
Larry Young, Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. and The American Bottling Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
