Cases 11 - 20 of 21
PITTSBURGH LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, INC. v. LASERSHIP, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01382
Plaintiff:
PITTSBURGH LOGISICS SYSTEMS, INC. and PITTSBURGH LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
JON HERBERGER and LASERSHIP, INC.
Senderovic v. Lasership, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00250
Plaintiff:
Zejid Senderovic
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Klatte v. Lasership, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Kevin Klatte
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Diawara v. Lasership, Inc.
as 7:2017cv05291
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sidy Diawara
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Caraballo v. Lasership Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01081
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Caraballo
Defendant:
Lasership Inc. and Laser Courier, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Crosby et al v. Lasership, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08694
Plaintiff:
Robert Crosby , John Lewis , Eli Jackson and others
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc. and Mahmoud, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Calamonaci v. Lasership, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03402
Plaintiff:
Dominick Mario Calamonaci
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc. , Laser Courier, Inc. and Steve Provenzano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Manuel Sanchez v. Lasership, Inc.
as 13-1478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL MILTON SANCHEZ, individually and on behalf of a group of individuals similarly situated, CARMELO MEDINA, individually and on behalf of a group of individuals similarly situated and GERARD EDMOND, individually and on behalf of a group of individuals similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
LASERSHIP, INC.
Sanchez et al v. Lasership, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00246
Plaintiff:
Manuel Milton Sanchez , Carmelo Medina and Gerard Edmond
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bunion et al v. Lasership, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01881
Plaintiff:
Larry Bunion , Joel Guerrero , Abraham Diallo and others
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc. and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
