Cases 1 - 10 of 32
MILLER v. GOGGIN et al
as 2:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant:
THOMAS NELLING, JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 2:2019cv01971
Defendant:
DR. PHILLIPS, C/O BAGWELL, C/O CAMPAGNA and others
Plaintiff:
GARTOR KIKI BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laughlin et al v. Multifund of Columbus, Inc. et al
as 1:2018mc00489
Plaintiff:
Harry Laughlin and Ellen Laughlin
Defendant:
Multifund of Columbus, Inc. and Graham Montigny
BENCKINI v. COOPERSBURG BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2015cv06017
Plaintiff:
GENE C. BENCKINI
Defendant:
COOPERSBURG BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, DANIEL C. TREXLER, WILLIAM NAHRGANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE HOMER LAUGHLIN CHINA COMPANY et al v. WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.
as 2:2015cv01201
Plaintiff:
THE HOMER LAUGHLIN CHINA COMPANY and HLC HOLDING, INC.
Defendant:
WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Nealman v. Laughlin et al
as 1:2015cv01579
Plaintiff:
Tawna Z. Nealman
Defendant:
Ryan P. Laughlin, Robert Maben, Christian Z. Snook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R.J. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03285
Plaintiff:
R.J. , DANIELLE BROWN , D.R.M. and others
Defendant:
PFIZER INC. and GREENSTONE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00521
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158
THE HOMER LAUGHLIN CHINA COMPANY et al v. HANNA'S CANDLE COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv00638
Plaintiff:
THE HOMER LAUGHLIN CHINA COMPANY and HLC HOLDING, INC
Defendant:
HANNA'S CANDLE COMPANY , THE BAZAAR, INC and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Younica et al v. Princeton Tower Development Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
George Younica and John Hazen
Defendant:
Princeton Tower Development Corporation and Toby Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
