Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Banks v. Sager et al
as 1:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. Sager, R & D Department, Fort Dix, NJ CFCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02135
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
ROUDABUSH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv00980
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRIS CHRISTIE, LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALDWIN et al v. RURAL PROJECTS, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv05359
Plaintiff:
HENRIETTA BALDWIN , KAREEM HENDERSON and ANTIQUAN ANTOINE BAINES
Defendant:
RURAL PROJECTS, LLC, LAUTENBERG FOR SENATE, INC. , RUSH HOLT FOR CONGRESS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Audrey Taylor v. NJ State, et al
as 09-3673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ, ZELMA FABER, NJ BD OF EDUCATION and others
Audrey Taylor v. NJ State, et al
as 09-3671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ, STATE OF NJ, ZELMA FABER and others
LAUTENBERG FOUNDATION, THE et al v. MADOFF
as 2:2009cv00816
Plaintiff:
LAUTENBERG FOUNDATION, THE, LAUTENBERG FOUNDATION, THE, LAUTENBERG FOUNDATION, THE and others
Defendant:
PETER MADOFF
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TAYLOR v. NEW JERSEY STATE et al
as 3:2009cv00553
Plaintiff:
AUDREY TAYLOR
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE, ZELMA FABER, NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BECKER v. HUDSON et al
as 1:2007cv05421
Petitioner:
JAN F. BECKER
Respondent:
HUDSON, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT A. FIATAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
