Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01052
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02466
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00879
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Anderson v. Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay, P.C.
as 2:2009cv02026
Plaintiff: Mark Anderson and Mark Anderson
Defendant: Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Type: Other Statutes None
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv08404
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv02713
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01978
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04262
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dean v. Law Office of Mitchell N. Kay, P.C.
as 0:2009cv01801
Plaintiff: Darwin Dean
Defendant: Law Office of Mitchell N. Kay, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?