Cases 1 - 10 of 135
KIM et al v. HANLON et al
as 3:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE GIORDANO HANLON, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO and others
Intervenor:
LAURA ALI, JOSE ARANGO, New Jersey Republican Chairs Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY, Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund and others
Interested Party:
DALE CROSS, JEFF PARROTT and TAHESHA WAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
Elizabeth Sines v. Michael Hill
as 23-1119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL HILL, MICHAEL TUBBS and LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH
Defendant:
RICHARD SPENCER, JASON KESSLER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL and others
Amicus Curiae:
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER and others
Elizabeth Sines v. Nathan Damigo
as 23-1122
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellant:
NATHAN DAMIGO
Defendant:
JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL and others
Amicus Curiae:
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER and others
Elizabeth Sines v. Jason Kessler
as 23-1154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL ENOCH PEINOVICH
Amicus Curiae:
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER and others
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16695
Plaintiff:
EPIC GAMES, INC.
Counter Claimant:
APPLE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
TILE, MATCH GROUP, INC., BASECAMP and others
In re: Mary Carr, et al v. Google LLC, et al
as 23-15285
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GOOGLE PLAY STORE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY CARR, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DIANNE BENTLEY, JENNIFER GRACE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC, GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED, GOOGLE COMMERCE LIMITED and others
Intervenor:
AMAZON.COM LLC
Amicus Curiae:
ATLANTIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, BUSINESS AND ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS and others
United States v. Broadcast Music, Inc.
as 23-853
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Appellant:
Radio Music License Committee, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Broadcast Music, Inc.
Petitioner:
Bankruptcy Law Professors
Amicus Curiae:
Television Music License Committee, LLC
Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al v. Internet Archive et al
as 1:2020cv04160
Plaintiff:
HarperCollins Publishers LLC, Hachette Book Group, Inc., Penguin Random House LLC and others
Defendant:
Internet Archive and Does 1 Through 5
Amicus Curiae:
Library Futures Institute, EveryLibrary Institute, and ReadersFirst, AMICI CURIAE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS, Michelle M Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Terrence Buehler v. Boeing Company, et al
as 23-2359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE BUEHLER, Personal Representative and Independent Administrator of the ESTATE OF LIU CHANDRA, deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
BOEING COMPANY, BOEING INTERNATIONAL SALES CORPORATION, ROCKWELL COLLINS, INCORPORATED and others
Amicus Curiae:
MARTIN DAVIES, Law Professor, ROBERT FORCE, Law Professor, STEVEN F. FRIEDELL, Law Professor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
