Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Espree v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00264
Petitioner:
Lawrence James Espree
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In Re: Falcon Global Offshore II LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01062
Petitioner:
Seacor Liftboats, LLC, Seacor Marine LLC and Falcon Global Offshore II LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Lawrence James Warren, II
Claimant:
Hannah Daspit, James Gracien, Bryan Mires and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Semco LLC, Talos Energy LLC, Donjon Marine Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30504
Lawrence Napper v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
as 20-20348
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAWRENCE JAMES NAPPER
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Lawrence Espree
as 20-40170
Defendant / Appellant:
LAWRENCE JAMES ESPREE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Napper v. Davis
as 4:2020cv00261
Respondent:
Lori Davis
Petitioner:
Lawrence James Napper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2018cv00169
Petitioner:
Lawrence James, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Warden Beaumont Low
as 1:2017cv00440
Petitioner:
Lawrence James Taylor
Respondent:
Warden Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rozell v. Welch, III et al
as 9:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Donny Ralph Rozell
Defendant:
Lawrence James Welch, III, Waste Connections US, Inc. , Lealco, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Collier et al
as 9:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
Lawrence James, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Kevin Wheat and Gregory Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Lawrence Taylor
as 16-11384
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAWRENCE JAMES TAYLOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
