Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Lawry v. The County of Nassau et al
as 2:2023cv04400
Plaintiff:
Trevor Lawry
Defendant:
The County of Nassau, U.S. Marshals and Village of Hempstead Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawry v. Barone
as 2:2023cv03625
Plaintiff:
Trevor Lawry
Defendant:
John Doe and Deputy Warden Vincenzo Barone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Antonio et al v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 1:2021cv01027
Plaintiff:
Michael D'Antonio and Nikki Lawrie
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department, Centene Corporation, MHM Health Professionals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMAS v. MARLER et al
as 2:2021cv04473
Petitioner:
DARRON THOMAS
Respondent:
SEAN MARLER, DEPUTY WARDEN LAWRY and FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FIGARO v. PISTRO et al
as 2:2021cv02346
Defendant:
R. WILLIAMS, MRS. KNOX, DEPUTY SUPT SHANNON and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN FIGARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Matthew A. Lawrie v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 1:2021cv00724
Defendant:
Christian Pfeiffer
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Lawrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew A. Lawrie v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 2:2021cv03477
Defendant:
Christian Pfeiffer
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Lawrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VINES v. MARLER et al
as 2:2021cv01792
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, SEAN MARLER, ALEXIS WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. VINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIGARO v. PISTRO et al
as 1:2021cv08968
Defendant:
R. WILLIAMS, LT. SHANNON, MR. PISTRO and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN FIGARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv01397
Defendant:
ASSOCIATE WARDEN PETE LAWRIE, WARDEN SEAN MARLER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
VACHO SHAHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
