Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Layne Christensen Company v. The Purolite Company
as 2:2009cv02381
Plaintiff:
Layne Christensen Company and Layne Christensen Company
Defendant:
The Purolite Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Small v. Layne Christensen Company et al
as 1:2009cv11167
Plaintiff:
Edward Small
Defendant:
Layne Christensen Company, Solmetex, Inc., Owen Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Obst v. Roush et al
as 2:2008cv02572
Plaintiff:
Willard A. Obst
Defendant:
Tyler A. Roush, GELCO Corporation, Layne Christensen Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Levelland/Hockley County Ethanol, LLC v. Layne Christensen Company
as 5:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Levelland/Hockley County Ethanol, LLC and Levelland/Hockley County Ethanol, LLC
Defendant:
Layne Christensen Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Layne Christensen Company v. Levelland/Hockley County Ethanol, LLC
as 2:2008cv02203
Plaintiff:
Layne Christensen Company and Layne Christensen Company
Defendant:
Levelland/Hockley County Ethanol, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barletta Heavy Division Inc. v. Layne Christensen Company
as 1:2007cv12081
Defendant:
Layne Christensen Company
Plaintiff:
Barletta Heavy Division Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
FRAZIER V LAYNE CHRISTENSEN
as 06-1584
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Airburst Technology, LLC, Frazier Industries, Inc. and William C. Frazier
Defendant-Appellee:
Layne Christensen Company and Prowell Technologies, Ltd.
BARBOUR WELL V CLAUDE LAVAL CORP
as 00-1404
Plaintiff-Appellant:
BARBOUR WELL SURVEYING CORPORATION and JOEL S. BARBOUR
Defendant-Appellee:
CCV ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, INC., CLAUDE LAVAL CORPORATION and LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
