Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Howard v. Macomb, County of
as 1:2023cv12595
Plaintiff:
Faytima Howard and Faytima Leak
Defendant:
Macomb County and Macomb, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Bibbs et al v. JPAY, L.L.C.
as 2:2023cv02792
Amicus Curiae:
Steven Abdul-Azziz El Bey and Steven L. Smith
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bibbs and Ronald Leaks
Defendant:
JPAY, L.L.C. and Viapath Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Toriano Leaks, Jr.
as 23-3547
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TORIANO A. LEAKS, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Digiovanni v. City of Sterling Heights et al
as 2:2023cv11341
Plaintiff:
Adam Digiovanni
Defendant:
Sterling Heights, City of, Wilson, Lynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leak v. Bouchard et al
as 2:2023cv10389
Plaintiff:
Patrick Deon Leak
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard and Kevin Thomas
Smith et al v. Grant et al
as 2:2021cv02302
Defendant:
JANE DOE, City of Dyersburg Tennessee, LOGAN ABBOTT and others
Plaintiff:
Felicia Currie, Charmin Smith, Tyrone L Smith, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Haynes et al v. Kaleon Global, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01060
Defendant:
Nathan Bailey, Randy Ferragina, Christian A. Leake and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Haynes and Melissa Haynes
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Keith Farmer v. Shawn Phillips, et al
as 20-5730
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. HAGEN, NWCX Disciplinary Board Chairperson, TONY PARKER, TDOC Commissioner, WILLIAM BYRON LEE, Tennessee Governor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH LEMONT FARMER
Leake v. Spike et al
as 2:2020cv02291
Plaintiff:
Rickey Leake
Defendant:
Officer Spike and Anthony Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
