Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lowrance et al v. Kernell et al
as 9:2019cv01108
Defendant: Joselin Elmore, Brian Comeau, Pandoria Rector and others
Plaintiff: David W. Lowrance and Margaret B. Lowrance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ervin v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2018cv20208
Plaintiff: Bradley Lee Ervin
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv60055
Petitioner: Lee Ervin Dale
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Curtis Ervin v. Ron Davi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-99010
Petitioner - Appellant: CURTIS LEE ERVIN
Respondent - Appellee: RON DAVIS, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
ERVIN et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as NJ/3:16-cv-05478
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL ERVIN and LEE ERVIN
Defendant: JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , Johnson & Johnson Co. and MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORP.
ERVIN et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv05478
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL ERVIN and LEE ERVIN
Defendant: JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO. and MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitenhill v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv00390
Plaintiff: William Whitenhill
Defendant: Eric Smith, Lee Ervin, Matthew E. Zames and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. David Ervin
as 16-10426
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID LEE ERVIN
Louis Jean-Louis v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 14-56135
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS J. JEAN-LOUIS, Private Attorney General
Defendant - Appellee: J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, DEBORAH BRIGNAC and others
USA v. Lee Dale We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-10733
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: LEE ERVIN DALE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?