Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Motley v. Janae Rocquel Motley Estate
as 24-1
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY ESTATE, beneficiary JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY, DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS, DERRION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DERRION RASHAD BROOKS and others
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff:
janae rocquel motley
Defendant:
JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McKinnies v. McCulley et al
as 4:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Dexter L. McKinnies
Defendant:
Robert McCulley and David Lee Vincent, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VINCENT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73338
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE VINCENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vincent, Jr. v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10939
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lee Vincent, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Rudin v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2017cv02389
Plaintiff:
Gregory Rudin
Defendant:
State of Missouri, David Lee Vincent, Edward McSweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00427
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Vincent
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Vincent v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00141
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Vincent
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Vincent v. Horne
as 1:2014cv21350
Plaintiff:
Lee Vincent
Defendant:
N. Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Gary Vincent
as 14-1300
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Gary Lee Vincent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
