Cases 31 - 40 of 274
Caraffa v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2021cv00808
Plaintiff:
Caraffa and Alfred Eric Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Moore v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-15618
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, JORGENSEN, First name unknown; County Attorney, MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Inmate Legal Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY MICHAEL KI'HEEM MOORE
Board of Trustees of UNITE HERE Health et al v. HRE Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00498
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Culinary and Bartenders Housing Partnership Fund, Board of Trustees of Southern Nevada Culinary and Bartenders Pension Trust, Board of Trustees of UNITE HERE Health and others
Defendant:
HIG Management, LLC a Nevada Limited Liability Company d/b/a Yong Kang Street, YKS Paris, LLC a Nevada Limited Liability Company d/b/a Yong Kang Street, Yolanda Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice et al
as 2:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
Geographies of Displacement University of Texas at Austin, Immigrant Justice Task Force, Wellington Avenue United Church of Christ, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2021cv01214
Plaintiff:
Geographies of Displacement University of Texas at Austin, Immigrant Justice Task Force, Wellington Avenue United Church of Christ, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children and others
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Centro Legal de la Raza et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review et al
as 3:2021cv00463
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Rosen, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff:
Tahirih Justice Center, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, Centro Legal de la Raza and others
Amicus Curiae:
Alameda County Public Defender's Office, University of California, Los Angeles Immigration Law Clinic, Former Immigration Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pangea Legal Services, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-17490
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., DOLORES STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES, CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Immigration Equality et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv09258
Plaintiff:
Black LGBTQIA Migrant Project, Immigration Equality, The Translatin@ Coalition and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
AIDS United, Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv09253
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Amicus Curiae:
Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense, Immigration Law Professors and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
