Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lemon v. Horse Rental Inc.
as 3:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
Bridget Lemon
Defendant:
Horse Rental Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MariMed, Inc. v. Burton et al
as 1:2023cv11668
Plaintiff:
MariMed, Inc.
Defendant:
Donnie Burton, Larry Lemons and The Harvest Foundation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (ADA 1990)
Scalia v. Sweet Lemon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv12217
Defendant:
Sweet Lemon, Inc. d/b/a Sweet Lemons Thai Restaurant agent of Sweet Lemons Thai Restaurant and Pornthip Neampong
Plaintiff:
Eugene Scalia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Liviz v. Supreme Court of the United State of America, et al
as 1:2018cv12620
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Louisiana Supreme Court, Kansas Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist ilya Liviz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hannon v. Beard
as 10-1792
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KEITH, RAYMOND COOK, SEAN MILLIKEN and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS HANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL DUFORD, GARY FYFE, ROBERT KOLBER and others
Defendant:
CLARK COLOR LAB and VINCENT MOONEY
Cook et al v. Maloney et al
as 1:2003cv12138
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cook , Francis Hannon , Sean Milliken and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Deorsey , Jeffrey Grimes , Richard Medeiros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hannon, et al v. Beard, et al
as 07-2272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS HANNON
:
RAYMOND COOK, SEAN MILLIKEN, WAYNE D. CROSBY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD and MARY J. HESSE
Bissanti v. Town of Bellingham et al
as 1:2007cv11198
Plaintiff:
Patrick W. Bissanti
Defendant:
Town of Bellingham, Gerard L. Daigle, Peter Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
