Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Wilson v. Sproul
as 1:2009cv00177
Petitioner:
Leroy Wilson, III
Respondent:
Kelvin Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Clifford Wilson
as 09-1623
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Clifford Leroy Wilson
Wilson v. Perez, et al
as 08-41282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY LEROY WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN A PEREZ, DEBORAH L SUGAREI, JAMES FITTS and others
Wilson et al v. Blue Bird Corporation et al
as 4:2008cv00183
Plaintiff:
W. Leroy Wilson, Glenda E. Wilson and WLWGEW LLC
Defendant:
Blue Bird Corporation, Blue Bird Corporation, Coachworks Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2310 (c) Consumer Product Warranties
Wilson v. TDCJ
as 08-41109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY LEROY WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN A PEREZ
Leroy Wilson v. V M Almader
as 8:2008cv00402
Petitioner:
Leroy Wilson
Respondent:
V M Almader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Wilson v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
as 2:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
Percy Leroy Wilson
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. ALGARIN et al
as 2:2007cv05488
Petitioner:
LEROY WILSON
Respondent:
JULIO M. ALGARIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crandall et al v. Powell et al
as 3:2007cv01955
Plaintiff:
Roger Crandall, Roger Crandall, Steven Frost and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Ismael et al
as 3:2006cv02420
Plaintiff:
Teddy Leroy Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ismael Brizyela, Hector Rubio, El Cajon Parole Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
