Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Lee et al v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 1:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
Leslie Lee and B.A.L.
Defendant:
Mark Kirkpatrick, M.D. , Howard S. Lefsky, M.D. , Inspire Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Meadows v. Colvin
as 5:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Leslie Lee Meadows
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp v. Lee
as 1:2016cv04700
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
Defendant:
Stephanie Lee and Leslie Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Philippe et al v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY et al
as 1:2015cv22608
Plaintiff:
Junior Philippe , Claurene Philippe , Terry Philippe and others
Defendant:
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Alexander Estevez and Leslie Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEE v. JONES
as 5:2015cv00069
Petitioner:
WILLIAM LESLIE LEE
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawson v. Smith
as 6:2015cv00038
Petitioner:
Leslie Lee Lawson
Respondent:
Aaron Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boardman et al v. Pacific Seafood Group et al
as 1:2015cv00108
Amicu:
Attorney General of the State of Oregon
Defendant:
Bandon Pacific, Inc., Bio-Oregon Properties, LLC, Bio-Oregon Protein, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Boardman, MY Fisheries, Inc., Miss Sarah, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2014cv01837
Plaintiff:
Leslie Lee Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Leslie Lawson
as 14-5823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LESLIE LEE LAWSON
Leslie Lawson v. Glenn Dotson, et al
as 14-5409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE LEE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENN DOTSON, CUAI at Kentucky State Reformatory, KRYSTAL WOODS, C/O at Kentucky State Reformatory, KIMBERLY JEFFERSON, Sergeant at Kentucky State Reformatory and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
