Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Chrome Hearts LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv00909
Plaintiff:
Chrome Hearts LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, A341XX7EWZ3VSL, aizhouyistore and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
TV Tokyo Corporation v. Amby's store et al
as 1:2025cv06197
Plaintiff:
TV Tokyo Corporation
Defendant:
Amby's store, AnandCart, baijinxiangdedian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Chanel, Inc. v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations
as 1:2025cv21839
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations, chetancmali8079, +8615659722976 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Merch Traffic, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2025cv00411
Plaintiff:
Merch Traffic, LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Ladily, Jinsine and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bao v. Lehman
as 1:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Lilin Bao
Defendant:
Danielle Lehman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Foreste v. Karp Scarsdale, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv01089
Plaintiff:
Liline Foreste
Defendant:
Karp Scarsdale, LLC doing business as The Ambassador of Scarsdale and Amba Sharma
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hannah v. Rogers, et al
as 6:2017cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hannah
Defendant:
Gengor L Ivy, Ronald E Joy and Lilin B Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
