Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HONE v. VASQUEZ et al
as 3:2021cv10153
Defendant:
TAYLOR TOSCANO, KATHRYN MORRIS, LINDA BAXTER and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HONE v. VAN DYKE et al
as 3:2021cv09809
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOE 1-10, TAYLOR TOSCANO, LINDA BAXTER and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HONE v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2021cv09544
Defendant:
TAYLOR TOSCANO, KATHRYN MORRIS, LINDA BAXTER and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HONE v. HANLON-SEHRON et al
as 3:2021cv07039
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, MARLENE LYNCH-FORD, DEBORAH HANLON-SEHRON and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HONE v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2021cv04991
Defendant:
HON. ANNE E. THOMPSON, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, MARLENE LYNCH-FORD and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HONE v. BAXTER et al
as 3:2021cv03105
Defendant:
BRAD BILLHIMER, MARLENE LYNCH FORD, TAYLOR TOSCANO and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baxter v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv02618
Plaintiff:
Linda Baxter
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMART et al v. KRAFT et al
as 1:2014cv02977
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART and A.I.S.
Defendant:
HOWARD KRAFT, ESQ., DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY and LINDA BAXTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baxter et al v. Dirty World, LLC
as 2:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Baxter and Linda Baxter
Defendant:
Dirty World, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Filing Error
as 3:2012cv02156
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc., DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Baxter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
