Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Albert Thomas v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 23-10440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, DEBORAH GONZALEZ, JOHN W. DONNELLY and others
Winston v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04345
Plaintiff:
Linda Winston
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Albert Thomas v. Governor of Georgia, et al
as 22-13851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, DEBORAH GONZALEZ, JOHN W. DONNELLY and others
Albert Thomas v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 22-13858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT CHARLES THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, DEBORAH GONZALEZ, JOHN W. DONNELLY and others
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv02064
Plaintiff:
Albert Charles Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albert Thomas v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 22-11638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN KEMP, DEBORAH GONZALEZ, JOHN W. DONNELLY and others
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv01475
Plaintiff:
Albert C. Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
Albert Charles Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Winston et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2010cv03859
Plaintiff:
Charles K. Winston and Linda Winston
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. and Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
