Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Bentz v. Atchinson et al
as 3:2014cv01132
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Michael Atchinson, Rick Harrington, Salvidor Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Widmer v. Butler et al
as 3:2014cv00879
Plaintiff:
Michael Widmer
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Phillips, Alex Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Widmer v. Butler et al
as 3:2014cv00874
Plaintiff:
Michael Widmer
Defendant:
Donella Kimberly Butler, M. Hanks, Roger Pelker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Widmer v. Butler et al
as 3:2014cv00859
Plaintiff:
Michael Widmer
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, R Pelker, Lindenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt v. Zeigler et al
as 3:2014cv00494
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Merritt
Defendant:
Major Zeigler, Lt Horton, C/O Lindenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Quinn et al
as 3:2014cv00326
Plaintiff:
Craig A Jackson, Louis Farrakhan and Ben Ammi
Defendant:
Pat Quinn, Lisa Madigan, David Rednour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINDENBERG v. ARRAYIT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv00833
Plaintiff:
TAMARIN LINDENBERG
Defendant:
ARRAYIT CORPORATION, ARRAYIT DIAGNOSTICS, INC., AVANT DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bentz v. Hughs et al
as 3:2013cv01280
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Robert Hughs, Ziglier, Sergeant Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Conway v. Kim Butler, et al
as 13-3598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL A. CARLOS CONWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, Asst Warden of Programs at Menard Correctional Center, RICK HARRINGTON, Chief Admin Officer at Menard Correctional Center, OFFICER LINDENBERG, Menard Correctional Center and others
Lindenberg v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv27115
Plaintiff:
Lien B. Lindenberg
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
