Cases 1 - 10 of 45
LEWANDOWSKI v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 1:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
ANN LEWANDOWSKI
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, THE PENSION & BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, PETER FASOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
LEWANDOWSKI v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
ANN LEWANDOWSKI
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, THE PENSION & BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, PETER FASOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
BaoNgoc T. Vo v. Thomas M. Seibel et al
as 4:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
BaoNgoc T. Vo
Defendant:
C3.ai, Inc., Thomas M. Seibel, Patricia A. House and others
BACA et al v. BAYER CORP. et al
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE BACA, MARY CAREY, CANDISE COLLINS and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP., BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BaoNgoc T. Vo v. Thomas M. Seibel et al
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
BaoNgoc T. Vo
Defendant:
Thomas M. Seibel, Patricia A. House, Lisa A. Davis and others
Nominal Defendant:
C3.ai, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Suri v. Siebel et al
as 4:2022cv03031
Plaintiff:
Naren Suri
Defendant:
Thomas M. Siebel, Patricia A. House, Richard Levin and others
Strouth v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STROUTH
Defendant:
Greg C. Garland, Phillips 66 Partners LP, Gary Adams and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
