Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Jones v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jones
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Shawn McKenzie, Judy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luevano v. Abilene Christian Univ. et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
Abilene Christian Univ., Slade L Sullivan and James D Litton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Morris v. Escambia County
as 23-13222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES LITTON MORRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
Litton v. Crews et al
as 3:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Clyde Litton
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Scott Jordan, KSP Unknown Correctional Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY
as 3:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LITTON MORRIS
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and ESCAMBIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2022cv17426
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LITTON MORRIS
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Precythe et al
as 4:2021cv00730
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, Unknown Frayler, Unknown Spark and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Z. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Precythe et al
as 4:2021cv00233
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, Lieutenant Unknown Sparks, Unknown Wilford and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Z. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Brooks et al
as 3:2020cv00278
Plaintiff:
Nelson and Nicholas M. Nelson
Defendant:
Brooks, T. Cook, C. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thurman Gaines v. Dean Borders et al
as 5:2018cv02117
Defendant:
Karleen M. Patino, D. Garza, Dean Borders and others
Plaintiff:
Thurman Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
