Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Jackson et al v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP
as 3:2010cv00813
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson and Debra Jackson
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jorge Torres v. Litton Loan Servicing LP
as 1:2010cv01709
Plaintiff:
Jorge Torres
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emanuel Dabney, et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al
as 10-60653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMANUEL DABNEY and TAUSHA DABNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., LITTON LOAN SERVICING LP and DECISION ONE MORTGAGE COMPANY, L.L.C.
Collins v. Litton Loan Servicing LP
as 1:2010cv02414
Plaintiff:
Lylton Collins, III
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Steven Valdez et al v. Litton Loan Servicing LP et al
as 2:2010cv05255
Defendant:
DOES and Litton Loan Servicing LP
Plaintiff:
Steven Valdez and Vera Valdez
Morgan v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP et al
as 1:2010cv01865
Plaintiff:
Olivia Joanne Morgan
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing, LP , American Modern Insurance Group and Fieldstone Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fenn v. King-Fenn et al
as 6:2010cv00965
Plaintiff:
Robert Fenn and Andrita King-Fenn
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peshek v. Litton Loan Servicing LP et al
as 2:2010cv00812
Defendant:
Bank Of America, N.A., Litton Loan Servicing LP and National Default Service Corporation
Plaintiff:
Heathen Peshek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Zeigler v. Litton Loan Servicing LP
as 2:2010cv00806
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing LP
Plaintiff:
Janie Zeigler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Karen Anderson, et al v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., et al
as 10-60302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN ANDERSON and TERRELL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LITTON LOAN SERVICING LP and COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
