Cases 1 - 10 of 24
A.F. of L-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan et al v. MI-DE-CON, Inc
as 1:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
A.F. of L-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, A.F. of L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Pension Plan, Allen Steadham and others
Defendant:
MI-DE-CON, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Mid-South Regional Council Local 318 Money Purchase Pension Trust et al v. Hogan
as 2:2019cv00452
Plaintiff:
Bill Caton, Mid-South Regional Council Local 318 Money Purchase Pension Trust, Jay Schuelly and others
Defendant:
Charles W Hogan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337
Gregory Eddins v. State of Alabama, et al
as 17-10223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY JAMES EDDINS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, CHERYL PRICE, Warden III, LLOYD HICKS, Warden I and others
HICKS V. JAYCO, INC.
as 1:2016cv01236
Plaintiff:
LLOYD HICKS
Defendant:
JAYCO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. USA
as 6:2016cv01289
Petitioner:
Benjamin Lloyd Hicks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Burrell v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00977
Plaintiff:
Reginald Burrell
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Grant Culliver, Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Price et al
as 2:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Walker , Sr
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen v. Hill et al
as 2:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
Willie Thigpen
Defendant:
Christian Hill, Hart, Cheryl Price and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen v. Hill et al
as 2:2013cv01754
Plaintiff:
Willie Thigpen
Defendant:
Christian Hill, Hart, Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shapley v. Price et al
as 2:2013cv01627
Plaintiff:
Shaun Shapley
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
