Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Humphreys v. Loan Depot, LLC
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Heidi Bourdon Humphreys
Defendant:
Loan Depot, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Clouse v. Loan Depot, LLC
as 8:2023cv02720
Plaintiff:
Jenice C. Clouse
Defendant:
Loan Depot, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sawicki v. Loan Depot LLC et al
as 2:2022cv14425
Plaintiff:
Zachary Sawicki
Defendant:
Loan Depot, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shelly Latimer et al v. Loan Depot LLC
as 8:2021cv02104
Plaintiff:
Shelly Latimer, Thomas Capon and Marjan Shansab
Defendant:
Loan Depot LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Benitez v. Loan Depot, LLC
as 8:2021cv01379
Defendant:
Loan Depot, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jesus Benitez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Oslick v. Navoy
as 2:2021cv00500
Defendant:
Loan Depot LLC and Ian Navoy
Plaintiff:
AVRAM D. OSLICK and AVRAM OSLICK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hampton v. Barclays Bank Delaware, et al
as 20-3175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY J. HAMPTON
Defendant:
EQUIFAX, INC., LOANDEPOT.COM, INC., FKA Loan Depot, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARKETPLACE LOAN GRANTOR TRUST, Series 2016 LD1, BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE and DISCOVER BANK
Winters v. Loan Depot LLC
as 2:2020cv01290
Defendant:
Loan Depot LLC
Plaintiff:
Richard Winters, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Manual Sosa et al v. Loan Depot LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07034
Plaintiff:
Manuel Sosa and Steven De La Paz Guijarro
Defendant:
Prestige Default Services, LLC, Loan Depot LLC dba IMortgage, Cenlar Capital Corporation dba Cenlar, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
