Cases 1 - 7 of 7
CUMMINGS v. BIRDSEYE et al
as 1:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID CUMMINGS
Defendant:
SARAH BIRDSEYE, SARA ANDERSON, AJ BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Dubar v. Brody et al
as 7:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Marian Elizabeth Dubar a woman d/b/a Marian Eliabeth Dubar Estate Living 28 Trust
Defendant:
Tao Brody d/b/a Leland One LLC, Edward M. Cherry d/b/a FCA Managemnt LLC, Emily Wingfield d/b/a Loebsack & Brownle, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Valerie Arroyo v. Southwood Realty Company
as 22-1160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALERIE ARROYO and DEREK OLIVARIA
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY, in its official capacity, DAN W. RATCHFORD, in his official and personal capacities, HERMAN RATCHFORD, JR., in his official and personal capacities and others
Arroyo v. Southwood Realty Company
as 21-2293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALERIE ARROYO and DEREK OLIVARIA
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY, in its official capacity, HERMAN RATCHFORD, JR., in his official and personal capacities, DAN W. RATCHFORD, in his official and personal capacities and others
Valerie Arroyo v. Southwood Realty Company
as 21-1922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALERIE ARROYO and DEREK OLIVARIA
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY, in its official capacity, DAN W. RATCHFORD, in his official and personal capacities, HERMAN RATCHFORD, JR., in his official and personal capacities and others
ARROYO et al v. SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
VALERIE ARROYO and DEREK OLIVARIA
Defendant:
SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY, LUZ GORDON, CITY OF CONCORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smile v. Loebsack & Brownlee, PLLC et al
as 3:2019cv00163
Plaintiff:
Al Smile
Defendant:
Loebsack & Brownlee, PLLC, Christopher Loebsack, Caudle & Spears, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
