Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Young v. Long Haul Trucking, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02644
Defendant:
Leighton A. Stevens and Long Haul Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz v. Orcutt et al
as 4:2017cv03826
Plaintiff:
Magdelena Otero Diaz
Defendant:
Douglas Elywin Orcutt and Long Haul Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley Baumann, et al v. Vladimir Zhukov, et al
as 14-2981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bradley B. Baumann, individually, co-special administrators of these Estates: Estate Of Christopher Douglas Schmidt, Diana Ruth Schmidt, Samuel Donovan Schmidt, Connor Bradley Schmidt, Nancy R. Baumann, individually, co-special administrators of these Estates: Estate Of Diana Ruth Schmidt, Samuel Donovan Schmidt, Connor Bradley Schmidt, Christopher Douglas Schmidt and Donna J. Costley, individually, co-special administrators of these Estates: Estate Of Diana Ruth Schmidt, Samuel Donovan Schmidt, Connor Bradley Schmidt, Christopher Douglas Schmidt
Defendant - Appellee:
Josef Slezak, Vladimir Zhukov, Swift-Truck Lines, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
North Metro Truck Leasing, LLC
George v. Long Haul Trucking Inc et al
as 1:2013cv01936
Plaintiff:
Linda Faye George
Defendant:
Long Haul Trucking Inc and Robert Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baumann et al v. Slezak et al
as 8:2012cv00383
Defendant:
AKI Trucking, Inc., John Does 1 - 10, Long Haul Trucking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Baumann, Nancy R. Baumann and Donna J. Costley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
NEELY v. KING et al
as 2:2012cv00800
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER NEELY
Defendant:
DAVID KING and LONG HAUL TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perry v. Long Haul Trucking, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv01863
Plaintiff:
Dawn R. Perry
Defendant:
Long Haul Trucking, Inc. and Kenneth L. Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
