Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Russ v. Meade et al
as 1:2019cv01571
Defendant:
Lorri Rohme, J Smith, Phil Grimes and others
Plaintiff:
Justin M. Russ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Justin Russ v. Phil Grimes
as 19-7824
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLIOT WAGNER, Medical Doctor, PETER OBER, Jail Physician (MD), PHIL GRIMES, Superintendent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN M. RUSS
Johnson v. Rohme et al
as 2:2019cv00553
Defendant:
Lorri Rohme and Sally Yeckley
Plaintiff:
Deandre Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Grims et al
as 2:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Derek Kent Rose
Defendant:
Phil Grims, Major Lorri Rohme, Captain Huston Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Unknown et al
as 3:2016cv00761
Plaintiff:
Steven Robert Banks
Defendant:
Brittany Unknown, Barbara Meade and Lorri Rohme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Richter et al
as 1:2016cv01096
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Thompson
Defendant:
Valerie Richter, Barbra Medds and Lorri Rohme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Higgs, Jr., et al
as 2:2016cv00479
Plaintiff:
Derek Rose
Defendant:
Joseph Higgs, Jr., Ms. Stevenson, Ms. C. Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Yeckley et al
as 2:2016cv00485
Plaintiff:
Derek Rose
Defendant:
Sally Yeckley, Lorri Rohme and Lynn Balamuta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Rappahannock Regional Jail Authority et al
as 1:2009cv01052
Plaintiff:
Loretta Mitchell and Loretta Mitchell
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail Authority, Scott Baird, Cpl. Barbozza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2007cv00351
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Bennett, Jr. and Ralph E. Bennett, Jr.
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Rappahannock Regional Jail Authority, Joseph Higgs, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
