Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lamb-Fort v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05779
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lamb-Fort
Defendant:
Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Nathan R. Harrington, Mark J. Toland and others
Rauner v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09056
Defendant:
David W. Long, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Nathan R. Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rauner
Summers v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv12024
Defendant:
Nathan R. Harrington, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Mark J. Toland and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Summers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shea v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08918
Defendant:
Campbell D. Rogers, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Nathan R. Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
Alec Shea
Sabatini v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01752
Plaintiff:
Eric Sabatini
Defendant:
Nathan R. Harrington, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Mark J. Toland and others
Bruso v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08536
Plaintiff:
John Bruso
Defendant:
Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Nathan R. Harrington, David W. Long and others
Louis Cannon, et al v. DC
as 14-7014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Louis P. Cannon, Eric Westbrook Gainey, Gerald G. Neill and others
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia
Cannon et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv04764
Plaintiff:
Shelby Cannon and Louis Lorenzo Cannon
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Louis Cannon, et al v. DC
as 12-7064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Louis P. Cannon, Stephen P. Watkins, Eric Westbrook Gainey and others
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia
CANNON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00133
Plaintiff:
LOUIS P. CANNON , STEPHEN P. WATKINS , ERIC WESTBROOK GAINEY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
