Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bridges v. Cain
as 2:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
Melvin Louis Bridges
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00915
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Walter Bridges, Jr. v. USA
as 19-1085
Petitioner / Appellant:
WALTER LOUIS BRIDGES, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anderson et al v. The Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri Illinois Metropolitan District et al
as 4:2016cv00908
Defendant:
The Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri Illinois Metropolitan District , Larry Jackson , Elke Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anderson and Anderson Paint Store, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridges, Jr. v. USA
as 2:2016cv12098
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Walter Louis Bridges, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Central Contracting and Marine, Inc.
as 4:2015cv01111
Plaintiff:
Central Contracting and Marine, Inc.
Claimant:
Thomas Industrial Coatings, Inc. , Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District and St. Louis Bridge Construction Company
Third_party_defendant:
Thomas Industrial Coatings, Inc. , Bi-State Development Agency Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District and St. Louis Bridge Construction Company
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Central Contracting & Marine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0181
Leland Properties LLC et al v. Citidal Energy Partners, LLC. et al
as 2:2015cv04891
Plaintiff:
Anthony and Angela Reed Family Trust, Blue Water Family Limited Partnership, Robert Frazier and others
Defendant:
Louis Bridges, Citadel Watford City Disposal Partners LP, Citidael Energy SWD Holdings LLC and others
USA v. Walter Bridges, Jr.
as 14-2430
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WALTER LOUIS BRIDGES, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
