Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lowe v. Seville, et al
as 3:2026cv00943
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Lowe
Defendant:
M. Seville, Warden, Wayne Wallace, Nurse S. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02636
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Mattingly Low Vision, Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2026cv03977
Plaintiff:
Mattingly Low Vision, Inc.
Defendant:
United States, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Commissioner Rodney S. Scott
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02631
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Busch v. Lowe's Companies, Inc
as 4:2026cv07723
Plaintiff:
Dean Busch
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Goodwin v. Covington Police Department et al
as 1:2026cv05307
Plaintiff:
David Brae Goodwin
Defendant:
Covington Police Department, Arresting Officer Murrah, Armor Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HINES v. LOWE
as 2:2026cv07007
Plaintiff:
COLBY D. HINES
Defendant:
RICHARD H. LOWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hobbs v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
as 2:2026cv00201
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hobbs
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02622
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Davidson v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 1:2026cv00365
Plaintiff:
Arlene Davidson
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
