Cases 1 - 10 of 1,446
Cano v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Francisco Magallon Cano
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
Andrew Walker
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martin v. Harrison
as 24-60238
Petitioner:
Clarence Martin
Respondent:
C. Harrison, Warden, Yazoo City Low
Corrales v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duarte-Vasquez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Duarte-Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Olvera-Galvan v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Olvera-Galvan
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Darge v. Warden - Yazoo City Low
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Patrick Darge
Defendant:
Warden - Yazoo City Low
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grammar v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00189
Petitioner:
Donny Grammar
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Powell v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 24-40240
Petitioner:
Jacob Alan Powell
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Stokes v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low
as 1:2024cv00571
Petitioner:
Michael Stokes
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
