Cases 1 - 10 of 334
LOWE v. GARMON
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOWE
Defendant:
MS GARMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olden v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Terrance Olden
Defendant:
Cameron Avery, Scott Jackson, . French and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Garmon
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Ms. Christopher Lowe
Defendant:
Unit Manager Garmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Artis et al
as 2:2024cv10795
Plaintiff:
John David Lay
Defendant:
Fredeane Artis, Walker, Kent and others
Bishop v. Bennett et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Montez Lisha Bishop and Montez Lesha Bishop
Defendant:
Jimmy Bennett, Scott Beard, Richard Kennedy and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. LOWE et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LOWE, SGT. KEMP, C.O. CROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCUNE v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W. MCCUNE, JR.
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT J. WALKER, C.O. MOHNEY, SGT. LESKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, THOMAS W. MCCUNE, BRIAN NELSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL HENRY, SUPERINTENDANT R. IRWIN, DEPUTY SUPT. I. GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
