Cases 21 - 30 of 2,607
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Artis et al
as 2:2024cv10795
Plaintiff:
John David Lay
Defendant:
Fredeane Artis, Walker, Kent and others
Tiwaz v. Lowe et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Miss Tiwaz, Sir Tiwaz, Cea Gleanbead Mai and others
Defendant:
Dale Lowe, Erin, Staff Lt. Dean J. Blades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villarroel v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Anni Villarroel
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
De Los Santos v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Sandy De Los Santos
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Roy Mosley v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 24-10896
Petitioner:
ROY MOSLEY
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
Guerrero v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Bairon Hurtado Guerrero
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ellis v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Nicholas Demontez Ellis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grammar v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 9:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Donny Grammar
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Castro-Martinez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
Castro Castro-Martinez and Oscar Orlando Castro-Martinez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
