Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thompson v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv50042
Plaintiff:
Elroda Shavaya Thompson and Elroda Shavon Thompson
Defendant:
Collette Peters, United States, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50360
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
Warden Bergami, Warden Gonzales, Warden A. Ciolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David McElveen v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv03595
Defendant:
Mr. Parrish, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Gregory Washington and others
Plaintiff:
David McElveen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. Aiken County Detention Center et al
as 9:2018cv02180
Defendant:
Nurse NFN Shellie, Lt Bowman, Deputy Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Shah Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilhite v. Hetitch et al
as 8:2018cv00536
Plaintiff:
Stephen B Wilhite
Defendant:
Lt Hetitch, Lt Clamp, Lt Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilhite v. Aiken County Detention Center et al
as 8:2017cv02296
Plaintiff:
Stephen B Wilhite
Defendant:
Deputy Gibson , Deputy Erikson , Lt Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Staples v. USA, et al
as 16-1391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES SAMUEL, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator of National Inmate Appeals and others
Frazier v. June et al
as 1:2014cv01091
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Frazier
Defendant:
Lt June, Ofc Martinez, Lt Kirkland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Warden Keith et al
as 6:2013cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jesse Owens
Defendant:
Warden Keith, Chief of Security Cotton, Jailer Yandell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.