Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BOYD v. WARDEN COX et al
as 5:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS BOYD
Defendant:
WARDEN COX, WHITAKER, LT HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Odum et al
as 5:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Hughes
Defendant:
Warden Roy Odum, Warden Cox, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Langley et al
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Harris
Defendant:
Terry Langley, Carroll County, Lt Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Langley
as 3:2022cv00188
Petitioner:
Charles Harris
Respondent:
Sheriff Terry Langley, LT Henderson, Carroll County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Epps v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Carlos Epps
Defendant:
Warden Sproul, AW Sosa, AW LeClair and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gamble v. Padula et al
as 5:2016cv03253
Plaintiff:
Ajaron Gamble
Defendant:
A J Padula, James Dean, Crystal Richburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Ford et al
as 8:2015cv01507
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thornton
Defendant:
Kelvin Ford, Lt Renick, Lt Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Allen et al
as 4:2015cv03040
Defendant:
Hon. Kristine Cook Graham, et. al., Cindy Adams, Marty Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Bishop et al
as 4:2015cv03041
Defendant:
8th Circuit, Marty Allen, DW. Marty Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Hess et al
as 1:2014cv03339
Defendant:
Mr. Delgado, Lt. Gonzalez, Lt. Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
