Cases 1 - 10 of 12
GORRIO v. TERRA et al
as 2:2023cv04366
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GORRIO
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT JOSEPH TERRA, CO SHORTER, CO KEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler Klingensmith v. "Jane" Taylor, et al
as 22-1821
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyler Klingensmith
Defendant / Appellee:
Internal Parole Off. "Jane" Taylor, Parole Officer, Dawn B. Vandiver, Parole Board Secretary, Dr. Sells, Unit Psychologist, Ouachita River Correctional Unit (ORCU) and others
Coleman v. Dunlap et al
as 8:2015cv05103
Plaintiff:
Darian Antonio Coleman
Defendant:
David Dunlap, Donnie Stonebreaker, Tony Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Espinoza v. Godinez et al
as 3:2015cv00639
Defendant:
Salvador A. Godinez, Daniel Conn, Louis Shicker and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos E Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Norman Shelton, et al
as 13-1473
Petitioner:
In re: NORMAN SHELTON
Respondent:
T. CRAWLEY, UNIT MANAGER BREWER, A. YOUNG and others
Nominal Respondent:
WILLIAM J. NEALON
In re: Norman Shelton, et al
as 13-1469
Petitioner:
In re: NORMAN SHELTON
Respondent:
T. CRAWLEY, UNIT MANAGER BREWER, A. YOUNG and others
Nominal Respondent:
WILLIAM J. NEALON
Scottie Hurst v. S. Snider
as 12-4072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTTIE R. HURST
Defendant - Appellee:
S. SNIDER, LT. HUNTER, LT. SCAMPONE and others
Rochester v. DeGeorgis et al
as 6:2011cv03221
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B DeGeorgis, C/O Garrison, D M McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. DeGeorgis et al
as 8:2011cv03221
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B DeGeorgis, C/O Garrison, D M McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pelzer v. McCall et al
as 8:2010cv02484
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Pelzer
Defendant:
Michael McCall , Miriam Cocciolone , Florence Mauney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
