Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Slater v. Woods et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00215
Plaintiff:
Demon Victorell Slater
Defendant:
Lt. Woods, Jefferson S. Dunn , Robert Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downes v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00437
Plaintiff:
James R. Downes
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Carter Davenport , Warden Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00532
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers , Cpt. Strickland , Mrs. Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00855
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00856
Plaintiff:
Antonio McGhee
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, et al v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00838
Plaintiff:
Willie Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Woods et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00675
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Lt. Woods, Kenneth Sconyers, Ms. Blakely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinetti v. Lamberti et al
as 0:2010cv62342
Plaintiff:
Donald Martinetti
Defendant:
Al Lamberti, Dr. Francowitz, M.D., Edith Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oden v. Mullins et al
as 2:2010cv00591
Plaintiff:
John E. Oden
Defendant:
James Mullins, Officer Jackson, Lt. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Bell et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00829
Plaintiff:
Terrance D. Hill
Defendant:
Darrell Bell, Joel Tew, Lt. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
