Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Moreno
as 23-10200
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Luis Carlos Moreno
United States of America v. Al Kassar (Godoy)
as 22-1567
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tareq Mousa Al Ghazi and Monzer Al Kassar, AKA Abu Munawar, AKA El Taous
Defendant / Appellant:
Luis Felipe Moreno Godoy
Garcia Moreno v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2022cv00843
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Garcia Moreno
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00637
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MORENO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20003
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS A MORENO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atencio v. Barr et al
as 5:2020cv00192
Defendant:
Chad Wolf, William Joyce, Shawn Gillis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Luis David Moreno Atencio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MORENO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv78071
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALBERTO MORENO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00117
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Atencio v. Gillis
as 5:2019cv00114
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Luis David Moreno Atencio
Defendant:
Shawn R. Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
