Cases 81 - 90 of 122
Santana-Reyes v. USA
as 3:2015cv01857
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Luis Santana-Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reyes-Fraire v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv00287
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Nash
Petitioner:
Luis Alonzo Reyes-Fraire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Acosta Rivera et al v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ivan Acosta Rivera, Sergio Alvarado Jimenez, Roman Luis Baltazar and others
Defendant:
DZT Inc., FedEx Corporation, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Reyes-Moreno v. United States of America
as 7:2014cv00790
Plaintiff:
Luis Gerardo Reyes-Moreno
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gonzalez-Reyes v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv00581
Plaintiff:
Luis Gonzalez-Reyes
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reyes-Serrano v. USA
as 8:2013cv02932
Plaintiff:
Luis Nunez Reyes-Serrano
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gil v. Ean Holdings, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2013cv07797
Plaintiff:
Fausto A. Gil
Defendant:
Ean Holdings, L.L.C. and Luis J. Reyes, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reyes-Cuellar v. United States of America
as 7:2013cv00630
Plaintiff:
Luis Orlando Reyes-Cuellar
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dilone v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv05489
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Luis Oscar Reyes Dilone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
