Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Prado v. Sullivan
as 3:2022cv02517
Plaintiff:
Luis Prado
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRADO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv37236
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS PRADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez et al v. Skyline Restoration & Preservation LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01062
Defendant:
Richard Roes 1-10, SKYLINE RESTORATION GROUP, LLC, SKYLINE RESTORATION & WATERPROOFING INC and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Corona, Andres Pinedo, Wilmer Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hunter v. Rockefeller, IV et al
as 0:2017cv01630
Plaintiff:
Dannez Hunter
Defendant:
John D.J. Rockefeller, IV, Trilateral Commission Nor, The, Indra K. Nooyi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Prado et al
as 1:2014at00643
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Luis Prado, Jose A. Mendoza and El Agave Night Club
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Prado et al
as 1:2014cv01343
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Luis Prado, Jose A. Mendoza, El Agave Night Club and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Sickler et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01684
Plaintiff:
Tony Sickler and German Rojas
Defendant:
Countrywide Financial Corporation, Bank of America, Quality Loan Services Corps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Luis Prado-Espinoza v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-74139
Petitioner:
LUIS PRADO-ESPINOZA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Luis Prado-Jimenez v. Linda Sanders
as 2:2007cv05722
Petitioner:
Luis Prado-Jimenez
Respondent:
Linda Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
