Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Godwin v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65242
Plaintiff:
Ms. Lundie L. Godwin
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baxter v. Burton et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Destiny Baxter
Defendant:
Tonya Burton, Christopher Rakes, Anthony W. Vickery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Preston v. Tanner et al
as 2:2023cv13281
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
Defendant:
Jeffery Tanner, Lawrence McKinney, Sean MacLean and others
Gonzalez v. Lundy
as 5:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Robert Gonzalez
Defendant:
Glenn Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Williamson v. Lorain County, et al.
as 1:2023cv01507
Plaintiff:
Mr. Harry Williamson and Harry Williamson
Defendant:
Lorain County, David Moore, Tom Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Lundy v. Randee Rewerts
as 23-1321
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS JAMES LUNDY
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDEE REWERTS
Brown v. Officer of the Desoto County, Mississippi Chancery Court et al
as 2:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
Greg Brown
Defendant:
Officer of the Desoto County, Mississippi Chancery Court, Judge Mitchell M. Lundy, Misty Heffner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lundy v. USA
as 3:2022cv00614
Petitioner:
Mark A. Lundy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hicks v. Garfield Heights, Ohio et al
as 1:2022cv01587
Plaintiff:
Willie Hicks and Martaze Burrell
Defendant:
Garfield Heights, Ohio, Ronald Dodge, Peter Stockhausen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lundy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Jamey Lundy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
