Cases 1 - 10 of 52
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
(PS) McGee v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jefferson A. McGee
Defendant:
State of California, The Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lungren v. Amazon Logistics, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lungren
Defendant:
Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00550
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158
LUNGREN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04818
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MAY LUNGREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marvin Hollis v. Richard Kay, et al
as 18-55607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN G. HOLLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD KAY, DIANE OBLOMSKY, Chief Medical Executive, S. SORENSEN, Senior Phyciatric Technician and others
Marvin Glenn Hollis v. Richard Kay et al
as 2:2018cv00830
Defendant:
Blain, M. Ha, Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Glenn Hollis
George Bridgette v. Donald Hill, et al
as 17-56867
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE BRIDGETTE
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD R. HILL, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and DANIEL E. LUNGREN
Kavin Rhodes v. Earnest Rowe, et al
as 17-55920
Petitioner - Appellant:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Respondent - Appellee:
EARNEST ROWE, CALIFORNIA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and DAN LUNGREN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
